Building a 13-Agent Claude Team with Peer Review Workflow

A developer shared their setup for creating a 13-agent Claude team that handles marketing for their AI video generation platform, Fruityo. The system runs every 15 minutes with agents reviewing each other's work before anything reaches the human operator.
Architecture Components
The infrastructure uses:
- OpenClaw - provides agents with web browsing, command execution, file management, and API interaction capabilities
- Cron - schedules agent heartbeats
- Telegram - notification layer for when agents need human attention
- PocketBase - database storing tasks, comments, documents, activity logs, and goals
- Claude Max - the AI model powering the agents
Workflow States
Tasks move through specific states with gates:
- backlog → todo → in_progress → peer_review → review → approved → done
Agents cannot skip peer review, and the boss agent cannot approve work without all reviewers signing off. Only the human operator can move tasks to "done."
The Agent Team
Each agent has a Game of Thrones-themed identity with specific roles defined in their SOUL.md file:
- Jon Snow (Boss) - Creates tasks, coordinates workflow, promotes peer-reviewed work to final review
- Tyrion (Content Writer) - Writes tweets, threads, blog posts, landing pages in the operator's tone
- Varys (Researcher) - Web research, competitor analysis, data mining
- Daenerys (Strategist) - Campaign planning, positioning, goal setting
- Arya (Executor) - Publishes content, runs automation, ships work
- Sansa (Designer) - Creates design briefs, visual concepts
- Sandor (Devil's Advocate) - Gives brutal, honest feedback, catches BS
- ... plus 6 more agents
The personality matters: Sandor reviews content like a skeptic, Tyrion writes with wit, and Varys digs for hidden data. Their SOUL files define behavior - Sandor will roast bad writing, Daenerys will flag strategic misalignment.
Heartbeat Protocol
Each agent runs in its own OpenClaw workspace with a scheduled heartbeat every 10 minutes (scattered by 1 minute each to avoid hitting the database simultaneously).
During a heartbeat:
- Agent authenticates and sets status to "working"
- Agent checks for tasks in its queue
- Agent performs its specialized work
- When one agent drafts content, others critique it before the human sees it
- When an agent gets stuck, it pings the boss agent
- When something is ready or stuck, it shows up in the operator's Telegram
The developer notes this approach works better than single-shot AI workflows for complex work that needs multiple steps across days, research that builds on previous findings, different specialized perspectives, quality review before shipping, and tracking what's done, blocked, or next.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

OpenClaw workflow automates meeting follow-ups, replaces Granola for user
A user replaced their $14/month Granola subscription with an OpenClaw workflow that transcribes meetings via STT, generates summaries on WhatsApp, breaks out action items, and creates draft follow-up emails automatically.

Practical OpenClaw Use Cases from Daily Experience
A developer shares six specific ways they use OpenClaw daily, including flight price watching, health coaching, and email polishing, while noting what didn't work like automated social posting.

Open-Source Claude Code Skill for Family Logistics Coordination
A developer built Parent Helper, a Claude Code skill that coordinates family schedules, meal planning, and grocery optimization using a single markdown file and MCP integrations. The tool projects $4.3K/year grocery savings by splitting lists across stores based on price.

Reddit user reports 30% budget waste from AI agent restart tax, shares checkpointing solution
A developer on r/LocalLLaMA found their team was spending 30% of their AI budget on restarts when workflows failed mid-task. They implemented checkpointing for every tool call, which immediately reduced API costs by eliminating redundant processing.