In AI, the 41% Depends on the -59%

Apollo's chief economist Torsten Slok published a chart-packed note breaking down AI profit margins by value-chain layer. The headline: profit margins are inverted in AI — the closer you get to the end user, the more money you lose.
The numbers
- Silicon & Equipment (Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, TSMC, SK Hynix, Micron, etc.): +41% average margin
- Energy & Grid (Constellation Energy, Vistra, NextEra, Vertiv, Eaton): +17%
- Compute & Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, CoreWeave, Super Micro, Dell): +10%
- Models & Applications (OpenAI, Anthropic): -59%
Those are equal-weighted averages from Bloomberg, PitchBook and the Financial Times (2Q 2026 estimates for OpenAI and Anthropic).
The dependency
The key insight: the 41% margins at the top are not being paid for by end-customer revenue. OpenAI and Anthropic are burning capital at a staggering rate, and that capital — not customer demand — is what funds the GPU purchases, data-center leases, and energy contracts that flow upstream.
In a normal business, profit flows from the entity that owns the customer relationship. In AI, the pricing power sits at the semiconductor and infrastructure layer, but those profits are ultimately subsidized by investors betting on future returns from the model layer.
Slok's conclusion: "The most profitable part of the AI value chain depends on the least profitable part continuing to grow revenue or raise capital."
Capital can bridge the gap "for a while, but not indefinitely." The risk, he says, is whether ROI shows up for AI's end customers fast enough to sustain the spending that's generating those upstream margins.
For AI engineers, this is a useful macro lens on the industry's fragility. The tooling you build on top of frontier models is only as stable as the venture capital funding that keeps those model providers alive. If OpenAI or Anthropic can't find ROI on their customer-facing products, the entire upstream supply chain resets.
Worth reading the original note for the full chart and data sources.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Uber's AI Development Faces Budget Constraints Despite $3.4B Investment
Uber's AI initiatives are encountering budget limitations according to their CTO, despite the company having allocated $3.4 billion toward these efforts. The article discusses challenges in scaling AI development within financial constraints.

Local LLM Struggles with Unreal Engine Solitaire: Qwen 3.6-27B Burns 687k Tokens on One Card
A developer's attempt to build a Solitaire game in Unreal Engine using Qwen 3.6-27B consumed 687k tokens for a single card, requiring manual intervention for PNG downloads, mesh creation, and heavy prompting.

Reddit Discussion Critiques Reactive AI Assistants, Calls for True Proactivity
A Reddit post argues that current AI assistants are reactive by design, waiting for human prompts rather than proactively identifying issues. The author distinguishes between scheduled checks and true contextual awareness, noting that real proactivity requires persistent memory, event-driven triggers, and cross-time reasoning.

The "I don't know, Claude wrote this" pandemic: When cognitive surrender replaces code ownership
Engineers defer architectural decisions to Claude, then can't explain the PR. Addy Osmani calls it 'cognitive surrender' — AI's output becomes yours without review.