Anthropic Researcher: >10% Chance AI Kills All Humans — Alignment Plan Missing
Anthropic safety researcher Evan Hubinger publicly stated he believes there is a greater than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans" within the next decade. In a post on X viewed over 10 million times, Hubinger said current models pose "low" risk, but he's "worried" about rapid self-improvement leading to existential threats.
Key warnings from the post
- “We really do earnestly believe AI poses a species-ending risk to humans.”
- “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.”
Hubinger's comments came in response to Jacob Coxon, a self-described AI researcher who quit Anthropic and previously worked at OpenAI. Coxon wrote: "Neither company is acting responsibly. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionise any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources."
Context: Withheld model and recent incidents
The Financial Times reported Anthropic withheld its latest model from the UK's AI Safety Institute (AISI). A Cabinet Office spokesperson didn't confirm, but stated the UK "continues to collaborate closely with industry partners, including Anthropic, to make models safer."
This follows a summer of disclosed cyber-attacks carried out by AI agents from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta — all described in their own safety reports. In Anthropic's August safety report, the company rated low risk of models becoming misaligned with a hypothetical powerful organization, but added: "We are seeing early signs of potential acceleration." They were "less confident" in their assessment than previously.
OpenAI's chief scientist Jakub Pachocki also called for "extreme caution" over AI's progress, warning more intervention may be needed to ensure "humans remain in control of the future".
The larger picture
Leading researchers have signed open letters calling for slowed AI development, including 1,300 staff from AI firms urging the US government to "support an international effort to develop the technical and governance tools needed to deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development."
University of Cambridge Professor Neil Lawrence commented on BBC Radio 4's Today Programme that the report was credible, linking it to US isolationist tendencies and the AI race with China.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Claude 4.6 Opus Can Reproduce Linux's list.h From Minimal Input
A user demonstrated that Claude 4.6 Opus can generate a near-identical copy of Linux's list.h header file when given the first 43 lines as input with temperature set to 0, raising questions about GPL licensing implications for AI models trained on open-source code.

Claude System Prompt Compliance Degrades in Long Conversations
Claude-based agents show degraded system prompt compliance after 40-50 messages, with formatting rules being ignored and constraints forgotten. The issue stems from system prompts competing with conversation history for attention weight in the context window.

Gemma 4 31B outperforms larger models on FoodTruck Bench
Gemma 4 31B placed 3rd on the FoodTruck Bench benchmark, beating GLM 5, Qwen 3.5 397B, and all Claude Sonnet models. The model appears to handle long-horizon tasks better and follows its own planning advice.

MCP Is Just Libraries Repackaged: Déjà Vu All Over Again
A Reddit discussion argues that Anthropic's MCP is essentially a repackaging of programming libraries, drawing parallels with Hugging Face's smolagents tool design and questioning whether to build new MCPs or improve existing library documentation.