Apple Silicon Benchmark: Qwen3-VL Performance on M3, M4, and M5 Max for Vision LLM Classification

Benchmark Setup and Hardware
A vision LLM classification pipeline was tested on technical drawings (PDFs at various megapixel resolutions) using LM Studio with MLX backend, streaming enabled, same 53-file test dataset, and same prompt. The task involves classification where the model analyzes an image and returns a short structured JSON response (~300-400 tokens), making inference heavily prefill-dominated with minimal token generation.
Hardware tested:
- M3 Max: 40 GPU cores, 48 GB RAM, 400 GB/s memory bandwidth
- M4 Max Studio: 40 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 546 GB/s memory bandwidth
- M5 Max: 40 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 614 GB/s memory bandwidth
Models Tested
- Qwen3-VL 8B: 8B parameters, 4-bit MLX quantization, ~5.8 GB on disk
- Qwen3.5 9B: 9B parameters (dense, hybrid attention), 4-bit MLX quantization, ~6.2 GB on disk
- Qwen3-VL 32B: 32B parameters, 4-bit MLX quantization, ~18 GB on disk
8B Model Results
Total time per image for Qwen3-VL 8B (4-bit):
- 4 MP: M3 Max 48GB: 16.5s, M4 Studio 64GB: 15.8s, M5 Max 64GB: 9.0s (M5 is 83% faster than M3)
- 5 MP: M3 Max: 20.3s, M4 Studio: 19.8s, M5 Max: 11.5s (77% faster)
- 6 MP: M3 Max: 24.1s, M4 Studio: 24.4s, M5 Max: 14.0s (72% faster)
- 7.5 MP: M4 Studio: 32.7s, M5 Max: 20.3s
The M3 Max and M4 Studio are basically identical on the 8B model, with total inference time within 3-5% despite M4 having 37% more memory bandwidth. The M5 Max is roughly 75-83% faster than both.
Why M3 and M4 Have Similar Speed
Prefill (prompt processing) scales with GPU compute cores, not memory bandwidth. Both chips have 40 GPU cores, so prefill speed is identical. For vision models, prefill dominates: TTFT (time to first token) is 70-85% of total inference time because the vision encoder does heavy compute work per image.
The M4 does show its bandwidth advantage in token generation: 76-80 T/s vs M3's 60-64 T/s (25% faster), matching the 37% bandwidth gap (546 vs 400 GB/s). However, for classification tasks with short outputs (~300-400 tokens), generation is only ~15% of total time, making the 25% generation speed advantage translate to just 3-5% end-to-end improvement.
32B Model Results
Total time per image for Qwen3-VL 32B (4-bit):
- 2 MP: M3 Max 48GB: 47.6s, M4 Studio 64GB: 35.3s, M5 Max 64GB: 21.2s
- 4 MP: M3 Max: 63.2s, M4 Studio: 50.0s, M5 Max: 27.4s
- 5 MP: M3 Max: 72.9s, M4 Studio: 59.2s, M5 Max: 30.7s
- 6 MP: M3 Max: 85.3s, M4 Studio: 78.0s, M5 Max: 35.6s
For longer generation tasks like summarization, description, or code generation, the M4's bandwidth advantage would matter more than in this classification workload.
📖 Read the full source: r/LocalLLaMA
👀 See Also
Public Backlash Against AI Is Real: Violence, Polling Data, and Diminishing Returns
A Molotov attack on OpenAI's CEO, Gen Z anger rising to 31%, and 80% of companies seeing zero productivity gain — the honeymoon is over for AI.

Claude Chat Leak via Google Search: What Developers Need to Know
Over the weekend, Claude AI share links were indexed by Google, exposing private chats including legal strategies and technical discussions. Anthropic has since blocked the search query. This is the second such incident.

Graduates Boo AI Pep Talks at Commencements: A Sign of Developer Sentiment
College graduates booed speakers pushing AI enthusiasm at commencement ceremonies, reflecting broader unease about AI's impact on jobs and society.

Nvidia commits $26B to open-weight AI models, releases Nemotron 3 Super
Nvidia will spend $26 billion over five years to build open-source AI models, according to 2025 financial filings. The company also released Nemotron 3 Super, a 128B-parameter model that outperforms GPT-OSS on benchmarks and ranks first on PinchBench for OpenClaw control.