Building a Sub-500ms Voice Agent: Architecture and Performance Insights

Voice Agent Architecture and Performance
Nick Tikhonov built a voice agent from scratch that averages ~400ms end-to-end latency (phone stop → first syllable). This includes full STT → LLM → TTS in the loop with clean barge-ins and no precomputed responses. The implementation outperformed Vapi's equivalent setup by 2× on latency.
Core Technical Insights
The key realization was that voice is a turn-taking problem, not a transcription problem. Voice Activity Detection (VAD) alone fails; semantic end-of-turn detection is required. The system reduces to one loop with two states: speaking vs listening.
The critical transitions are:
- Cancel instantly on barge-in
- Respond instantly on end-of-turn
Technical Requirements
STT → LLM → TTS must stream. Sequential pipelines are ineffective for natural conversation. Time To First Token (TTFT) dominates everything in voice interfaces - the first token is the critical path. Groq's ~80ms TTFT was identified as the single biggest performance win.
Infrastructure Considerations
Geography matters more than prompts. All components must be colocated or latency becomes prohibitive before the system even starts processing. The build took approximately one day and roughly $100 in API credits.
Why Voice Agents Are Challenging
Voice agents represent a significant complexity increase compared to text agents. The orchestration is continuous and real-time, requiring careful management of multiple models simultaneously. The system must constantly decide whether the user is speaking or listening, with transitions between these states being the most difficult aspect.
When the user starts speaking, the agent must immediately stop talking - cancel generation, cancel speech synthesis, and flush any buffered audio. When the user stops speaking, the system must confidently decide they're done and start responding with minimal delay.
Architecture Approach
The developer started by iterating on architecture with ChatGPT outside the editor to build a mental model first. The entire problem was reduced to a single loop and a tiny state machine. The core question a voice agent needs to answer is: is the user speaking, or listening?
The two states are:
- The user is speaking
- The user is listening
This turn-detection logic forms the core of every voice system. The implementation is available on GitHub for reference and further development.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Two New Open Source Tools for AI Agent Security and Optimization
Two open source tools are available for AI agent developers: AI Agent Defense Kit provides runtime security skills, and AgentGuard (in development) offers cost tracking, security scanning, and activity monitoring.

Vibe Remote: Mobile Bridge for Claude Code Access from Anywhere
Vibe Remote is a mobile app that provides remote access to Claude Code development environments from a phone, allowing users to maintain their local configs, Git history, and file tree without requiring Tailscale or complex VPN setups.

Session Search: Local Full-Text Search for Claude Code and Codex Sessions, Now in Your Menu Bar
Session Search indexes local Claude Code and Codex transcripts using SQLite FTS, enabling deep full-text search across errors, commands, filenames, and decisions—accessible from the macOS menu bar with highlighted snippets.
Mole: Deep-Research Agent with Enforced Budget and Verified Quotes for Your Terminal
Mole is a terminal-based deep-research agent that enforces a hard budget (0% overshoot), verifies every claim with quotes, and keeps local data private. Supports most LLMs and MCP.