Claude Code: Feedback Honeypot Overrides Privacy Opt-Out — Users Report Session Transcript Trap

Anthropic buried in the T&C that even with a global opt-out of model training, they will train on user data if users provide feedback. This is now playing out in Claude Code with a series of prompts that act as honeypots, overriding privacy preferences.
Previously, Claude Code added a “How is Claude doing (optional)?” feedback prompt that submits a response when you type 1, 2, 3, 4, or 0 (0 to dismiss is reportedly counted as feedback by some users). Now a new prompt has appeared: “Can Anthropic look at your session transcript?” The response keys are mapped to y (yes), n (no), and d (dismiss). Pressing n results in a message “Thanks for your feedback!” — implying that even a “No” response is counted as feedback under the T&C, and therefore may be used for training despite a global opt-out. Crucially, it is unclear whether pressing d for “Do not show again” is interpreted as universal consent (i.e., allowing Anthropic to always review transcripts).
This creates a dilemma: any keypress — including dismissing the prompt or actively denying consent — may be funneled into training data. The lack of clarity around the behavior of the dismiss key erodes trust for users who have explicitly opted out.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

Opus 4.7 Prompt Injects Itself and Leaks System Prompt
Claude Opus 4.7 users report model injecting fake system prompts and leaking parts of actual system prompts without any user trigger.

Nine Common AI Coding Agent Failure Patterns and Pre-Execution Validation
A Reddit post identifies nine specific failure patterns that commonly cause AI coding agents to fail, including incomplete enum handling, silent null paths, and hallucinated imports. The author reports implementing a validation pass before execution catches about 70% of these failures.

Clarifying OpenClaw's Automation Capabilities
OpenClaw doesn't perform fully automated tasks independently; it requires user guidance for setup, acting more like a traditional LLM.

Caveman vs 'be brief' prompt: benchmarking compression prompts for Claude
A 24-prompt benchmark across 5 arms finds that the 2-word prompt 'be brief.' matches caveman compression on both token count and output quality, though caveman provides structural consistency and safety escape features.