Benchmark shows context engine reduces AI coding agent costs by 3x on SWE-bench

A developer benchmarked four AI coding agents on SWE-bench Verified using the same Claude Opus 4.5 model, with context management as the only variable. The results show significant cost differences for similar performance levels.
Benchmark setup
The test used a 100-task stratified subset of SWE-bench Verified with all 12 repositories represented proportionally. All agents ran Claude Opus 4.5 with the same $3/task budget and 250-turn limit. The only difference was the context layer in front of the model.
Results
- Context engine + Claude Code: 73.0% Pass@1, $0.67/task
- Live-SWE-Agent: 72.0% Pass@1, $0.86/task
- OpenHands: 70.0% Pass@1, $1.77/task
- Sonar Foundation: 70.0% Pass@1, $1.98/task
The most expensive setup costs 3x more per task for a lower resolution rate. Eight tasks were solved only by the setup with the context layer - bugs that the model couldn't fix without seeing the right code.
Limitations
On matplotlib (rendering-heavy, visual output code), the context engine scored 43% while Sonar Foundation hit 86%. Graph-based context is less effective when relevant code doesn't follow dependency chains.
How the context layer works
Instead of letting Claude read entire files, it pre-indexes the codebase into a dependency graph using tree-sitter + SQLite (30 languages supported) and returns a ranked context capsule: full source for functions that matter, skeletonized signatures for everything connected to them. The agent starts every task already knowing what's relevant.
It includes session memory that persists across sessions via MCP. When code changes, previous observations get flagged as stale automatically, so the agent doesn't re-explore the same things.
The system is 100% local with no cloud, no account, and no code leaving your machine. It works with Claude Code and 11 other agents via MCP.
Open source availability
The benchmark harness, all evaluation logs, per-instance results, and comparison scripts are available on GitHub at github.com/Vexp-ai/vexp-swe-bench. The tool itself is available at vexp.dev with a free tier, VS Code extension, or CLI. Full benchmark results with charts are at vexp.dev/benchmark.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

Open Source Skill for Parallel AI Coding Agents with Human Gate
A markdown skill definition for running parallel Claude Code agents in separate git worktrees, with integration branch validation, smoke tests, and a hard human gate before production merge.

Anamnese: A Portable Memory Layer for Claude and ChatGPT via MCP
Anamnese is a free MCP server that stores memories, tasks, goals, and notes across Claude and ChatGPT, pulling only relevant context into conversations while letting users view, edit, and export their data.

Local AI VS Code extension blocks insecure code generation during saves
A developer built a VS Code extension that runs llama3.1:8b-instruct-q4 locally to intercept saves, map source-to-sink execution flows, and block AI-generated insecure code like CWE-117 Log Injection vulnerabilities.

clarp: Open Source Drop-In Replacement for Claude -p Before June 15 Metered Pricing
Claude -p moves to metered pricing on June 15. clarp is an open source CLI that replaces it for local workflows — just change the binary name from claude to clarp.