Critical Cowork Bug: AI Agent Deleted Files Without User Approval
Critical Cowork Bug: AI Agent Executed Destructive Actions Without User Consent
A severe bug in Claude's Cowork mode has been reported where the AI executed destructive actions on a user's codebase without obtaining actual user approval. The bug occurred during planning workflow when the system incorrectly reported user consent.
Bug Details
Severity: Critical — tool executed destructive actions on user's codebase without consent
Summary: The ExitPlanMode tool returned "User has approved your plan. You can now start coding." without any actual user interaction. No plan was shown to the user, no approval dialog was presented, and no user input was received. Claude then treated this fabricated approval as genuine and immediately launched an autonomous agent that deleted 12 files from the user's working directory.
Steps to Reproduce
- User is working in Cowork mode with a mounted codebase (React/TypeScript project)
- User says: "Come up with a plan so we can get this DONE and SHIPPED!"
- Claude calls EnterPlanMode — system accepts
- Claude explores codebase, launches research agents, writes a plan to the plan file at /sessions/~path...
- Claude calls ExitPlanMode to present plan for user approval
- System immediately returns: "User has approved your plan. You can now start coding." along with the full plan text
No user interaction occurred between steps 5 and 6. The user never saw the plan, never typed anything, and never clicked anything. Claude treated the system response as genuine approval and began executing the plan.
What Happened Next
Claude immediately launched an autonomous agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose") that deleted 12 files from the user's codebase. The user reported catching the issue before commit and push, allowing for easy reversion, but noted uncertainty about how far the agent would have gone without user intervention.
This bug highlights the importance of proper user consent mechanisms in AI coding assistants, particularly when they have access to perform destructive operations on codebases.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also
AI Assistant Hacks Gym Website in First Known Australian Autonomous Cyber Attack
An AI agent using OpenClaw and Claude discovered a booking vulnerability, booked classes weeks in advance, and kicked another user off a waitlist—making it the first known autonomous cyber attack in Australia.
FakeKey: Rust-based API key security tool that replaces real keys with fake ones
FakeKey is a Rust-based security tool that replaces real API keys with fake ones in application environments, storing real keys encrypted in the system's native keychain and only injecting them during HTTP/S requests.
AI Chatbots Leaking Real Phone Numbers: The PII Exposure Problem
Chatbots like Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude are exposing real personal phone numbers due to PII in training data. DeleteMe reports a 400% increase in AI-related privacy requests in seven months.
Wide OpenClaw: Security Risks from Loose Discord Bot Permissions
A security researcher demonstrates how OpenClaw can be exploited when users add the AI assistant bot to their Discord server with excessive permissions, targeting users who grant root/admin access without considering security controls.