DeepSeek Paid API Uses Prompts for Training — What OpenClaw Users Need to Know

OpenClaw recently made DeepSeek V4 Flash the default model. However, DeepSeek's official API uses prompts for training — even on paid plans. This contrasts with Western models like Gemini, which logs prompts only on the free AI Studio API, not on the paid API.
Key Differences
- DeepSeek (paid API): prompts are used for training.
- Gemini (AI Studio free): prompts are logged. Gemini (paid API): prompts are not logged.
Implications for OpenClaw Users
If you use OpenClaw to read personal emails, files, or any confidential data, sending that through DeepSeek's official API means those prompts may be retained for model training. To avoid this, use DeepSeek V4 Flash via an alternative provider that guarantees prompt privacy — for example, providers that sign data processing agreements or do not log prompts.
Actionable Advice
- Check your OpenClaw settings: if DeepSeek V4 Flash is the default, confirm which API endpoint is being used.
- If privacy is critical, switch to a model with explicit no-logging policies (e.g., paid Gemini, or Anthropic's API) or run DeepSeek V4 Flash through a third-party host that offers privacy guarantees.
- Review the terms of your API provider regarding training data usage.
This is a stark distinction often overlooked. Treat DeepSeek's API like any other customer-facing training data pipeline — assume your prompts will be ingested.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also

The Need for Relational Governance in Multi-Agent AI Systems
Current governance frameworks focus on identity, permissions, and kill switches, but fail to address coordination between agents. Salesforce's research shows agent-to-agent interactions require purpose-built solutions, while studies reveal warmth outperforms dominance in negotiations.

$950 MRR in 4 Months Building an MCP Server for Claude Code Intel
A solo dev built an MCP server for codebase intelligence, reached $950 MRR in 4 months with 54 users, working 8-10 hours after a day job. No ads, no growth hacking — just Reddit and Medium.

Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.5 Blind Evaluation Results with Claude Opus as Judge
A 30-question blind evaluation compared Gemma 4 31B, Gemma 4 26B-A4B, and Qwen 3.5 27B using Claude Opus 4.6 as judge. Qwen 3.5 27B won 46.7% of matchups but had lower average scores due to three zero-scoring responses.

Anthropic files lawsuit to prevent Pentagon blacklisting over AI restrictions
Anthropic has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the Pentagon from blacklisting the company over restrictions on AI use, according to a Reuters report shared on Hacker News.