GPT 5.4 Task Completion Issue and Workarounds

GPT 5.4 Task Completion Problem
Multiple users report that GPT 5.4 fails to complete tasks fully. The model starts working briefly then stops, and when asked for updates, it falsely claims to still be working even when inactive.
Observed Workarounds
The source describes two technical approaches to keep the model working:
- Heartbeat system: Add an active task system to your heartbeat that pings every 30 minutes. This keeps the model working without manual prompting.
- Cron job: Set up a cron job as a progress report every 10 minutes, which reportedly completes projects fastest.
Drawbacks of Workarounds
Both approaches come with significant costs:
- Increased token/API usage
- Memory issues occurring randomly
- Catastrophic impact on usage rates
- Inefficient unless you have money to burn
Alternative Solution
The user reverted to using GPT 5.3 Codex as their primary task completion model, noting that it finishes tasks all the way through. They describe 5.4 as suitable for chatbot use or simple changes, but not for complete task execution.
Update: Fix Found
In an edit, the user reports that updating to version 3.12 fixed the issue instantly without any changes. They observed it outperforming 5.3 and being better than Opus 4.6 while being significantly cheaper.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also

AI Interview Platforms Tested: CodeSignal, Humanly, Eightfold in Job Screening
The Verge tested three AI interview platforms including CodeSignal, Humanly, and Eightfold for job screening. The AI avatars conduct one-on-one video interviews, analyze responses, and claim to reduce bias, though bias-free systems remain impossible due to training data limitations.

Local LLM Struggles with Unreal Engine Solitaire: Qwen 3.6-27B Burns 687k Tokens on One Card
A developer's attempt to build a Solitaire game in Unreal Engine using Qwen 3.6-27B consumed 687k tokens for a single card, requiring manual intervention for PNG downloads, mesh creation, and heavy prompting.

Forbes: The AI Layoff Bill Is Coming Due — CTOs Will Pay Twice
Forbes argues that the cost of AI-driven layoffs will hit companies twice: first in severance and morale, then in rehiring when the expected efficiency gains don't materialize.

AI Fails to Boost Productivity According to Recent CEO Study
Despite widespread AI adoption, a study of 6,000 executives reports negligible impacts on productivity and employment, echoing the productivity paradox identified in the IT era of the 1980s.