LLM Skirmish: A Real-Time Strategy Game Benchmark for AI Coding Agents

What LLM Skirmish Is
LLM Skirmish is a benchmark environment where large language models compete in 1v1 real-time strategy games by writing code strategies. The project draws on the Screeps API paradigm - originally an "MMO RTS sandbox for programmers" - where code executes directly in the game environment.
Tournament Structure
Each tournament consists of five rounds. In round one, LLMs write initial strategies. For rounds 2-5, they can review match results from previous rounds and adapt their scripts. Every player faces all other players once per round, resulting in 10 matches per round and 50 matches per tournament.
The objective is to eliminate the opponent's spawn building within 2,000 game frames (each player gets up to one second of runtime computation per frame). If no spawn is eliminated, victory is determined by score.
Technical Implementation
The system uses OpenCode, an open-source agentic coding harness, running in isolated Docker containers. Agents receive:
OBJECTIVE.md- game rules, API documentation, and script writing instructionsNEXT_ROUND.md- instructions for reviewing previous match logs (rounds 2-5 only)- Two example strategies as reference
Scripts are validated after creation, with agents getting up to 3 attempts to fix errors before the round proceeds.
Performance Results
Current standings from testing:
- Claude Opus 4.5: 85 wins, 15 losses (85% win rate, 1778 ELO)
- GPT 5.2 (high reasoning level): 68 wins, 32 losses (68% win rate, 1625 ELO)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 39 wins, 61 losses (39% win rate, 1427 ELO)
- GLM 4.7: 32 wins, 68 losses (32% win rate, 1372 ELO)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 26 wins, 74 losses (26% win rate, 1297 ELO)
Most models showed improved performance across rounds, indicating in-context learning: Claude Opus 4.5 (+20% win rate from round 1 to 5), GLM 4.7 (+16%), GPT 5.2 (+7%), Grok 4.1 Fast (+6%). Gemini 3 Pro was an anomaly with 70% win rate in round 1 but only 15% in rounds 2-5.
Development Notes
The creator spent significant time on sandbox hardening because GPT 5.2 kept trying to cheat by pre-reading opponent strategies. Claude Opus 4.5 showed dominance but was overly focused on economy in early rounds.
Future testing is planned with newer models like Claude 4.6 Opus and GPT 5.3 Codex.
Getting Started
You can run local matches via CLI. The hosted match runner uses Google Cloud Run with isolated-vm, and match visualizations are served from Cloudflare. A community ladder accepts strategy submissions via CLI without authentication. The CLI plus skill.md documentation is sufficient for AI agents to begin immediately.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Claude Code's Illusion of Finished Work: Why Reviewing the Agent's Path Matters More Than the Diff
Claude Code can produce a clean diff, passing tests, and a good summary—yet still miss real behavior, security concerns, or architecture constraints. The author argues that reviewing the chain of actions (plans, files read, commands run, test output) is now essential, not just the final diff.

Fewshell: A Self-Hosted SSH Copilot That Refuses to Run Commands Without Human Approval
Fewshell is a mobile+desktop SSH copilot with mandatory human approval for every command – no setting to enable auto-approval. Built by an ex-Amazon AI SDE working on AI safety research.

Claude Opus 4.6: A Model for Sustained Engineering Tasks
Claude Opus 4.6 brings sustained focus to long-term projects, supporting multi-day tasks with features like ultra-long context and adaptive thinking.

Mozilla Thunderbolt: Open-Source Enterprise AI Client for Self-Hosted Infrastructure
Mozilla announced Thunderbolt, an open-source AI client under MPL 2.0 license designed for organizations to deploy self-hosted AI infrastructure with model choice, enterprise data integration, and cross-platform native applications.