Multi-AI Orchestration Setup Using Claude Code with GPT and Gemini

Multi-AI Development Setup
A developer describes their workflow using three AI models orchestrated together in a single development environment. The setup addresses the problem of losing context between sessions by implementing a persistent file-based system.
Context Layer Implementation
The system uses markdown files as the protocol for maintaining context across sessions:
CLAUDE.md- Main operating file containing projects, preferences, constraints, and current session statePROFILE.md- Holds professional identity including background, communication style, and decision patternsSESSION_LOG.md- Logs every session with what was done, decided, and pending, organized newest first.claude/history/- Directory where a session-closer agent captures learnings, decisions, research findings, and ideas into separate files
The developer reports having 50+ knowledge files after three months of use. At the end of each work block, they say "close the session" to trigger the Session Closer sub-agent that updates session logs, knowledge history, workspace improvements, and ROI tracking.
Three AI Models in One Workspace
The setup uses three AI subscriptions:
- Claude Code (Opus 4.6) - Serves as the orchestrator handling deep work, complex analysis, skill system, and session management
- GPT-5.4 via Codex CLI - Handles code review, implementation, and debugging (named Dario)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro - Performs web research, Google Workspace integration, and multimodal analysis (named Irene)
Each model has its own SOUL.md file defining identity, mission, strengths, and limits:
- Claude's:
.claude/SOUL.md - GPT's:
.codex/SOUL.md - Gemini's:
.gemini/SOUL.md
They also have operational files (AGENTS.md for GPT, GEMINI.md for Gemini) that specify what to read at session start, what rules to follow, and who the other peers are.
Integration and Communication
All three models read the same context files (CLAUDE.md, PROFILE.md, SESSION_LOG.md, and the history directory), ensuring shared knowledge across sessions.
Models can call each other using CLI commands without API or middleware:
codex exec --skip-git-repo-check "Review this function for edge cases"
gemini -m gemini-3-flash-preview -p "Search for recent benchmarks on X"
claude -p "Summarize the last 3 session log entries"The entire setup runs inside Gemini's Antigravity IDE with three terminals for the three models on the same screen.
Additional Layers
An async layer uses OpenClaw (on OpenAI subscription) to handle scheduled jobs like recurring research tasks, data checks, and content pipelines. All three models in the IDE can trigger or interact with these jobs.
A custom MCP Server connects to a Telegram bot for notifications. When a task takes time, the model notifies the developer when complete, allowing parallel workstreams without terminal babysitting.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

Practical Applications of OpenClaw for One-Person Company Operations
A developer shares their experience using OpenClaw for running a one-person company, noting it runs on your own machine in a VM or on a Mac Mini and connects to existing tools. The post suggests it's most applicable for repetitive tasks and small operations work rather than fully autonomous company management.

Developer builds macOS banking app with Claude Code in 6 weeks
A developer created simplebanking, a free open-source macOS menu bar app for German banks using Claude Code. The app shows live balances across multiple accounts, provides transaction search, subscription detection, and keeps all data locally.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Sonnet 4.6 for Philosophical Argumentation: A User's Direct Comparison
A detailed comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 for philosophical and humanities work reveals Opus excels at analytical decomposition but levels down subtext, while Sonnet reads nuance better but has weaker prose. The user found Opus exhausting for implication-heavy thinking and switched to Sonnet.

Practical Lessons from Using AI Agents on a 100k LOC Codebase
A developer shares six specific techniques learned while using Claude Code and Cursor to build a pandas-compatible API layer on top of chDB, including maintaining a CLAUDE.md rules file, using zero-context agents as critics, and structuring multi-agent workflows with filesystem-based coordination.