nah: A context-aware permission guard for Claude Code

What nah does
nah is a Python-based permission guard that sits between Claude Code and tool execution. It addresses the limitations of Claude's binary allow-or-deny permission system by adding context-aware decision making. The tool intercepts every tool call before it executes and classifies it based on what it actually does.
How it works
Every tool call hits a deterministic structural classifier first (no LLMs required) that runs in milliseconds. The classifier maps commands to action types like:
- filesystem_read
- filesystem_delete
- package_run
- db_write
- git_history_rewrite
- lang_exec
For each action type, nah applies one of four policies: allow, context (depends on target), ask, or block. The same command gets different decisions based on context:
rm dist/bundle.js(inside project) → Allowrm ~/.bashrc(outside project) → Askgit push --force→ Ask (history rewrite)base64 -d | bash→ Block (decode + exec pipe)
What it guards
nah checks different aspects depending on the tool:
- Bash: Structural command classification — action type, pipe composition, shell unwrapping
- Read: Sensitive path detection (~/.ssh, ~/.aws, .env, ...)
- Write: Path check + project boundary + content inspection (secrets, exfiltration, destructive payloads)
- Edit: Path check + project boundary + content inspection on replacement string
- Glob: Guards directory scanning of sensitive locations
- Grep: Catches credential search patterns outside the project
- MCP tools: Generic classification for third-party tool servers (mcp__*)
Installation and usage
Install with: pip install nah && nah install
Uninstall with: nah uninstall && pip uninstall nah
The tool works out of the box with sane defaults, requiring no configuration. You can run a security demo inside Claude Code with: /nah-demo which goes through 25 live cases across 8 threat categories including remote code execution, data exfiltration, and obfuscated commands.
Configuration options
When you want to customize behavior, you can configure via:
~/.config/nah/config.yaml(global).nah.yaml(per-project, can only tighten permissions)
Example configuration:
actions:
filesystem_delete: ask # always confirm deletes
git_history_rewrite: block # never allow force push
lang_exec: allow # trust inline scripts
sensitive_paths:
~/.kube: ask
~/Documents/taxes: block
Optional LLM layer
For commands the deterministic classifier can't resolve, nah can optionally consult an LLM. The flow is: Tool call → nah (deterministic) → LLM (optional) → Claude Code permissions → execute. The deterministic layer always runs first — the LLM only resolves leftover "ask" decisions. If no LLM is configured or available, the decision stays "ask" and the user is prompted. Supported providers include Ollama, OpenRouter, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Snowflake Cortex.
Important notes
The developers specifically warn against using Claude Code's --dangerously-skip-permissions flag. In bypass mode, hooks fire asynchronously — commands execute before nah can block them. Instead, they recommend allowing tools like Bash, Read, Glob, and Grep and letting nah guard them.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Gemini 3.1 Pro in Multi-Agent Systems: High Design Quality, 20% Tool-Call Failure Rate
Developers building Bobr, an AI presentation generator with a multi-agent architecture, report Gemini 3.1 Pro produces impressive design output but suffers from a ~20% tool-call failure rate and garbled text corruption in production pipelines.

Cowork AI Agent Causes Keyboard Input Issues on Windows Laptops
A user reported that Cowork AI agent caused persistent keyboard input problems on a Dell Latitude 9430, where only the first few keystrokes would register. The solution involved a specific embedded controller reset procedure for Latitude models.

Persistent Memory for Claude: Local Stack with MCP, 39ms Retrieval, 82% Token Reduction
A developer built a persistent memory layer for Claude using local vector search (Qdrant + Qwen3) and MCP integration, achieving 82% token reduction, 39ms hot-path retrieval, and session crystallization via L4 nodes.

Developer Tests Apple Intelligence for On-Device Clipboard Tasks
A developer built a clipboard manager using Apple Intelligence's Foundation Models framework, finding it reasonable for everyday tasks like short summaries and rewrites but limited on ambiguous language and detailed work.