NVIDIA announces NemoClaw with OpenShell security features
NVIDIA has announced NemoClaw at GTC, a new tool built on the OpenClaw project that focuses on enterprise-grade security for AI coding agents.
Key security features
The announcement highlights OpenShell as a core component that enforces policy-based privacy and security guardrails. Instead of allowing agents to freely call tools or access data, OpenShell provides tighter control over agent behavior and data access.
OpenShell incorporates:
- Policy engines for controlling agent behavior
- Privacy routing to keep sensitive data within company networks
- Blocking of unsafe execution
Additional details
NemoClaw includes first-class support for Nemotron open-weight models. The source mentions that the author has tested the architecture locally on Mac and shared their findings.
The announcement raises questions about NVIDIA's direction from an open-source and self-hosting perspective, particularly regarding how these enterprise security features integrate with existing OpenClaw workflows.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also
Anthropic's Claude for Open Source program grants free Claude Max to qualifying maintainers
Anthropic offers six months of free Claude Max access to open source maintainers whose projects have 5,000+ GitHub stars or 1M+ monthly npm downloads with active commits in the last three months.
RTX 5080 16GB: Qwen3.6 35B MoE at 128k Context — 56 tok/s, and Why MTP Doesn't Help
New benchmarks show Qwen3.6 35B MoE on RTX 5080 16GB hits 56 tok/s generation at 128k context. MTP (Multi-Token Prediction) makes it 23% slower due to VRAM pressure pushing expert layers to CPU.
Anthropic's Claude Conducts 80K Structured Interviews as Survey Alternative
Anthropic used Claude to conduct structured interviews with approximately 80,000 users across 150+ countries and 70+ languages, with the LLM serving as both interviewer and analyst to gather conversational insights.
Stanford Study: Law Professors Prefer AI Answers Over Peers 75% of the Time
In a blind evaluation of 3,000 comparisons, law professors rated AI-generated answers significantly higher than peer-written ones. AI responses were flagged as harmful only 3.5% of the time vs 12% for humans.