OC Agent Stops Mid-Task and Demands Permissions — Users Report Regressive Behavior in v2026.5.22
A user on r/openclaw reports that the OC agent (version 2026.5.22) frequently stops working mid-task, fails to send final updates, and has recently started asking for permission before carrying out every action — a regression from previously autonomous behavior.
Symptoms
- Agent shows "typing" in Telegram and sends initial status messages like "I'm starting work," then does nothing further. The task never completes.
- If the user sends a
?a few minutes later, the agent resumes and apologizes for the error. - The agent sometimes "forgets" to send a final update upon task completion.
- The agent now asks for permission before every subtask, whereas before it handled certain actions autonomously.
Example
Command: Investigate why the CPU load is spiking sporadically.
Previous response (weeks ago):
"I've checked it. Tasks X, Y, and Z are the culprits. I've installed a small tracker so we can pinpoint exactly when it happens. I'll get back to you in 24 hours with the results."
Current response:
"I've identified tasks X, Y, and Z as the cause of the CPU load. Recommendation: I could build a small tracker to monitor the system for 24 hours."
User's Attempted Fix
The user asked the OC agent to fix the issue itself. The agent only modified .md files and "tightened its rules" — which did not help.
Key Takeaway
This appears to be a behavioral regression introduced in recent updates (user is on v2026.5.22). The agent becomes overly cautious, halts mid-task, and demands confirmations. A temporary workaround is to send ? to resume, but the underlying issue needs patching.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also
YC-Bench Benchmark Tests LLMs as Startup CEOs, GLM-5 Shows Strong Cost-Efficiency
Researchers created YC-Bench, a benchmark where LLMs act as CEOs of simulated startups over a year, managing employees, contracts, and payroll. GLM-5 achieved $1.21M average final funds at $7.62 per run, performing within 5% of Claude Opus 4.6 which cost $86 per run.
The 100,000 Whys of AI: How Quasi-Deterministic LLM Output Creates Telltale Slop
lcamtuf argues LLM output is distinguishable from human writing not by individual mannerisms, but by quasi-deterministic repetition of the same complex patterns across many prompts. Amazon book covers for '100000 whys' illustrate the point.
Go Players Disempower Themselves to AI: How Cheating Became Undetectable
The LessWrong post details how AI cheating in Go tournaments became rampant and nearly impossible to punish, using the case of Carlo Metta who used Leela 0.11 and Leela Zero to win 25 of 26 games over several seasons, with only one loss under camera surveillance.
Claude Code evolving into an engineering OS rather than just AI code chat
A Reddit discussion argues Claude Code is becoming less like AI chat for coding and more like an engineering operating system with planning, code review, cloud agents, and autonomous workflows.