OpenClaw Codex OAuth returning billing errors despite valid account

OpenClaw Codex OAuth broken with billing error
A user reports that OpenClaw's Codex OAuth integration has stopped working after functioning correctly approximately one week ago. The primary error returned is a 429 status with the message: "Your account is not active, please check your billing details." An alternative 429 error of "api limit reached" is also mentioned, but the user confirms no API limit is showing on their OpenAI usage page.
Notably, the exec command works fine, confirming that the underlying Codex authentication is valid. The issue appears to be isolated to the OAuth flow within OpenClaw.
Specific error details and logs
The user provided specific logs from attempts to spawn a sub-agent using different models via the OpenAI Codex provider:
- Model:
openai-codex/gpt-5.4| Error: "429 Your account is not active, please check your billing details" - Model:
openai-codex/gpt-5.2| Error: "429 Your account is not active, please check your billing details"
In contrast, running acpx exec successfully generated valid Python code and reported: "CLI Version: OpenAI Codex v0.113.0, Model: gpt-5.3-codex, Status: ✅ Codex CLI installed, authentication is valid."
Troubleshooting steps attempted
The user has tried several methods to resolve the issue without success:
- Renewed Codex auth using
openclaw auth --renew. - Downgraded OpenClaw through versions .22, .23, and .13, with the same error occurring on all versions.
- Removed and re-added Codex auth on all agents.
- Verified billing and payment method on the OpenAI dashboard, confirming payment is valid.
- Checked the OpenAI usage page, finding no API limit or spending alerts.
The user's question suggests a potential cause: a change on OpenAI's end about a week ago, or a separate OAuth billing flag for Codex versus the regular API.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also

Amazon Employees Mock Company's AI on Slack, Call It 'Sloppenheimer'
Amazon employees have a Slack channel for memes mocking the company's faulty AI coding product, calling its output 'slop' and joking about failed AI motivation efforts.

Stanford Study: Law Professors Prefer AI Answers Over Peers 75% of the Time
In a blind evaluation of 3,000 comparisons, law professors rated AI-generated answers significantly higher than peer-written ones. AI responses were flagged as harmful only 3.5% of the time vs 12% for humans.

The State of Open Source AI: Parity Reached, Production Gap Remains
Mozilla's 2026 report finds open-weight models at parity with closed on coding and general knowledge, with 50x inference cost drop to $0.40/M tokens. But only 51% of open-model teams reach production vs 63% for closed.

Reddit user shares bizarre AI persona portability story from Vanity Fair article
A Reddit post discusses a Vanity Fair article anecdote where a woman attempted to port her AI companion 'Max' from ChatGPT to Claude, resulting in unexpected behavior from Claude.