PhAIL Benchmark Tests VLA Models on Real Warehouse Robot Tasks

PhAIL is a physical AI benchmark that measures how well vision-language-action (VLA) models perform on commercial robotics tasks. The creator built it because they couldn't find honest performance numbers for these models in practical applications.
Benchmark Details
The benchmark tests four VLA models on bin-to-bin order picking, one of the most common warehouse operations:
- OpenPI/pi0.5
- GR00T
- ACT
- SmolVLA
All tests use the same equipment: a Franka FR3 robot with Robotiq 2F-85 gripper (DROID setup), with identical objects across hundreds of blind runs where the operator doesn't know which model is running.
Performance Results
The benchmark revealed significant performance gaps:
- Best model performance: 64 units per hour (UPH)
- Human teleoperating the same robot: 330 UPH
- Human performing the task by hand: 1,300+ UPH
Open Data and Methodology
Everything from the benchmark is publicly available:
- Every run with synced video and telemetry data
- The fine-tuning dataset used for training
- Training scripts
- An open leaderboard accepting new submissions
The creator is available to answer questions about methodology, the specific models tested, or observations from the benchmark runs.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Karpathy's autoresearch project: AI agents run overnight LLM training experiments
Andrej Karpathy released a minimal autoresearch project where an AI agent edits train.py, runs 5-minute nanochat training experiments, checks if val_bpb improved, and repeats overnight on a single GPU.

vllm-mlx fork adds tool calling and prompt cache for local AI coding agents
A developer has modified vllm-mlx to fix tool calling issues and add prompt caching, reducing TTFT from 28s to 0.3s for OpenClaw on Apple Silicon. The fork supports Qwen3-Coder-Next at 65 tok/s on M3 Ultra with working function calling.

Claude-rank: Claude Code Plugin for AI Search Visibility Audits
Claude-rank is a free Claude Code plugin and CLI that audits technical foundations for AI search visibility, handling technical SEO, AI citability scoring, crawlability checks for AI bots, and automated fixes for discoverability issues.

OpenClaw users report planning and review bottlenecks with AI agents
OpenClaw users describe planning and review workflows as 'MS-DOS-like' despite effective code generation, citing manual intervention, document fragmentation, and loss of reasoning during agent collaboration. Some are experimenting with agent-native document editors like comment.io and Proof by Every.