Benchmark Comparison of Qwen 3.5 Models Against Major AI Models

A benchmark comparison website has been shared that provides head-to-head performance data for multiple large language models. The site includes verified scores and comparative infographics for a range of models, focusing on the Qwen 3.5 series from Alibaba.

Models Included in the Comparison

The source lists the following models as being part of the full comparison:

• GPT-5.2
• Claude 4.5 Opus
• Gemini-3 Pro
• Qwen3-Max-Thinking
• K2.5-1T-A32B
• Qwen3.5-397B
• GPT-5-mini
• GPT-OSS-120B
• Qwen3-235B
• Qwen3.5-122B
• Qwen3.5-27B
• Qwen3.5-35B

What the Source Provides

The source material specifically states that the comparison includes "all verified scores and head-to-head infographics." This suggests the website aggregates performance metrics from standardized AI benchmarks, which typically measure capabilities in areas like reasoning, coding, and general knowledge. The link provided points to a dedicated comparison site at https://compareqwen35.tiiny.site.

For context, benchmark comparisons are a standard method in the AI community to evaluate model performance objectively. The Qwen series are open-source models developed by Alibaba, and comparing them against proprietary models from OpenAI (GPT), Anthropic (Claude), and Google (Gemini) provides practical data for developers choosing which model to use or fine-tune for specific tasks. The inclusion of parameter sizes (e.g., 122B, 397B) indicates the comparison covers models of varying scales, which is relevant for assessing performance versus computational cost.