Secure Administrator Approval Flow for Group-Chat Assistants Against Prompt Injection

✍️ OpenClawRadar📅 Published: May 24, 2026🔗 Source
Secure Administrator Approval Flow for Group-Chat Assistants Against Prompt Injection
Ad

The r/ClaudeAI post "Mitigating prompt injections in group-chat assistants: Pausing VM and OAuth tool execution for admin approvals" describes a practical security pattern for LLM-based assistants connected to public or shared channels (e.g., WhatsApp via Supergreen or group chats). The core problem: when multiple users share the same session history, any participant can prompt-inject the assistant to trigger dangerous tools — spinning up cloud resources, running code with mapped secrets, or fetching OAuth tokens.

Ad

Secure Administrator Approval Flow

The proposed solution in prompt2bot is a Secure Administrator Approval flow that intercepts high-risk tool executions:

  • When a non-admin user triggers create_vm, run_safescript (custom code execution with mapped secrets), or OAuth flows, the tool pauses execution and returns: "requesting admin permission...".
  • An approval link with a 10-minute TTL is automatically sent to configured administrators via WhatsApp or email.
  • Once approved, a background job injects a system notification into the conversation history: [System notification: The administrator has approved your request to execute <toolName> (Request ID: <requestId>)].
  • This thought-injection wakes the agent loop, which re-calls the tool with the approved request_id to continue seamlessly.
  • For guest users (bot owners without configured email/phone), approvals are bypassed for frictionless developer testing.

Who This Is For

Developers building highly capable assistants that operate in shared channels and need to secure powerful tool access against prompt injection attacks from untrusted participants.

📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI

Ad

👀 See Also

Security Audit Experiment Shows AI Agent Performance Depends on Knowledge Access
Security

Security Audit Experiment Shows AI Agent Performance Depends on Knowledge Access

A developer ran three security audits on the same Next.js codebase using different AI approaches: Claude Code's built-in review found 1 critical, 6 high, 13 medium issues; an AI agent without extra context found 1 critical, 5 high, 14 medium; an AI agent with 10 professional security books found 8 critical, 9 high, 10 medium issues.

OpenClawRadar
ClawGuard: Open-Source Security Gateway for OpenClaw API Credential Protection
Security

ClawGuard: Open-Source Security Gateway for OpenClaw API Credential Protection

ClawGuard is a security gateway that sits between AI agents and external APIs, using dummy credentials on the agent machine while storing real tokens separately. It provides Telegram approval for sensitive calls and maintains an audit trail of requests.

OpenClawRadar
13 Words on Reddit Can Manipulate AI Search: Cornell Research
Security

13 Words on Reddit Can Manipulate AI Search: Cornell Research

Cornell research shows that a 13-word snippet on Reddit or Wikipedia can reliably poison AI search agents. Half of all AI citations come from UGC sites, making it trivially easy for brands to inject promotional content.

OpenClawRadar
Redacta: An OpenClaw Skill That Pseudonymises Clinical Text Before It Reaches an LLM
Security

Redacta: An OpenClaw Skill That Pseudonymises Clinical Text Before It Reaches an LLM

Redacta is an open-source OpenClaw skill that detects identifiers in medical text and replaces them with consistent pseudonyms before sending to an LLM. It runs locally and has passed 1,400 downloads on ClawHub.

OpenClawRadar