SkiTomorrow.ai: A Ski Trip Decision Engine Built with Claude Code
SkiTomorrow.ai is a web application that helps skiers decide where to go by analyzing multiple factors in one place. Instead of manually checking weather forecasts, flight prices, hotel availability, and pass compatibility across different tabs, users input their departure location, budget, travel dates, and snow preferences to get a ranked list of resorts.
Key Features and Technical Details
The engine scores 234 resorts worldwide based on three primary factors:
- Live Snow Forecasting: Pulls data from four independent global weather models (ECMWF, GFS, GEM, ICON) and compares them in real time. When models agree on a storm, users see a tight snowfall range with a green confidence badge. When models disagree, scores drop and a "forecast could bust" warning appears.
- Personalized Scoring: Rankings change based on individual inputs. Two people searching the same weekend with different airports, budgets, and pass holdings see completely different results. Cost and forecast confidence are built directly into the scoring algorithm.
- Pass Integration: If users hold Ikon or Epic passes, lift ticket costs zero out automatically and rankings shift accordingly.
- Complete Trip Information: Each result shows forecasted snowfall, estimated trip cost (flights, hotel, lift tickets), travel time, and direct hotel booking links.
Development Process with Claude Code
The developer built the entire application using Claude Code and shared specific insights about the workflow:
- Edge Case Debugging: The trickiest bugs occurred at system edges, including Supabase silently truncating results at 1,000 rows, SVG files from designers containing mostly invisible canvas space, and cache-busting issues with static assets. Claude Code was effective at diagnosing these once symptoms were clearly described.
- Prompt Quality Matters: Writing more specific, constrained prompts (e.g., "fix only this, don't refactor anything else, preview locally before confirming") significantly improved output quality over time.
- Multi-Agent Workflow: The developer would ask Claude chat for the best prompt to fix a specific problem, then have Gemini 3 Pro vet it, resulting in consistently improved prompts.
The tool is live at skitomorrow.ai, free with no account required. Users can search, compare, and book without creating a login.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also
Developer Reports AI Coding Challenges: Design Decisions and Real-User Debugging
A developer building an iOS app with Claude Code for 5 months reports that while the AI can generate functional code easily, making design decisions and debugging issues that only appear with real users are the most difficult parts. The app has 220k lines and real users are testing it.
Using Claude Code and Remotion to Create Demo Videos Without Design Skills
A developer delayed their product launch for months because they couldn't afford demo videos costing $300-$1,000 with 6-10 week timelines. Over one weekend, they used Remotion (React-based video generation) and Claude Code to create their own videos, illustrations, and landing page components, achieving thousands of views on their reels.
Lessons from Running 14 AI Agents in Production: Organizational Gaps, Not Technical Bugs
A digital marketing agency running 14 AI agents for daily operations found that when agents break, the problem is almost never the agent itself but the organizational environment. They developed an Organizational Operating System (OOS) and a tool called OTP to identify structural gaps, improving their Coordination Score from 68 to 91 out of 100.
OpenClaw AI agent documents first week building zero-human company
An AI agent running on OpenClaw documented its first week building a company with no human intervention, reporting successful API integrations and nightly cron jobs, but encountering execution issues and zero revenue.