State Flow Machine: Non-Transformer Architecture Maintains 62% Accuracy on Long Sequences Where Transformers Drop to 2%

A developer has built State Flow Machine (SFM), a non-transformer architecture designed for tasks requiring state tracking across long sequences. The model runs on a single Huawei Ascend 910 ProA NPU and addresses transformers' limitations in simulating processes step-by-step when sequences exceed training lengths.
Architecture Details
Instead of attention heads, SFM uses a bank of explicit memory slots (small fixed-size vectors). At each token, a gating mechanism decides which slots to update and how. The model reads from slots, computes an update, and writes back, functioning like a tiny differentiable register file. This approach is related to DeltaNet, Linear Attention, and state-space models (Mamba, RWKV) but more explicit—slots are directly addressable and updated via learned gates rather than being an implicit recurrent state.
Benchmark Setup
The synthetic program state tracking benchmark involves sequences like x = 42; x += 17; x -= 8; x *= 2; ... where the model must predict the final value of x (integer 0–100, framed as 101-class classification).
- Training data: 10,000 programs with 10–27 operations, hard difficulty (all ops: add, subtract, multiply, integer divide, modulo, set), seed 42
- Validation: 1,000 programs, same distribution
- Evaluation: test at 1× (in-distribution), 2×, 4×, 8×, 16×, and 32× the training program length
Results
Exact Match Accuracy:
- 1× (10 ops): State Slots 99.9%, Transformer-Fair 100.0%, Transformer-Large 100.0%
- 2× (20 ops): State Slots 92.9%, Transformer-Fair 99.0%, Transformer-Large 99.5%
- 4× (40 ops): State Slots 62.0%, Transformer-Fair 1.9%, Transformer-Large 3.1%
- 8× (80 ops): State Slots 35.3%, Transformer-Fair 1.3%, Transformer-Large 1.0%
- 16× (160 ops): State Slots 5.1%, Transformer-Fair 0.9%, Transformer-Large 0.7%
- 32× (320 ops): State Slots 5.0%, Transformer-Fair 1.0%, Transformer-Large 0.8%
Generalization ratio (accuracy retention):
- State Slots: 4×/1× = 0.62×, 8×/1× = 0.35×
- Transformer-Fair: 4×/1× = 0.02×, 8×/1× = 0.01×
- Transformer-Large: 4×/1× = 0.03×, 8×/1× = 0.01×
Mean Absolute Error at extrapolation lengths (scale 0–100):
- 4×: State Slots 14.03, Transformer-Fair 40.33, Transformer-Large 36.76
- 8×: State Slots 26.73, Transformer-Fair 41.71, Transformer-Large 41.19
The transformers are essentially guessing randomly at 4× and beyond (MAE ~40 on a 0–100 scale is close to the expected error of a uniform random guess), while State Slots continues making meaningful predictions.
Model Parameters
State Slots uses 961K parameters, compared to Transformer-Fair (443K) and Transformer-Large (2.2M).
📖 Read the full source: r/LocalLLaMA
👀 See Also

Claude Code v2.1.183: Safer Auto Mode, TUI Fixes, and Destructive Git Command Blocking
Claude Code v2.1.183 blocks destructive git commands in auto mode unless you explicitly ask, adds model deprecation warnings, fixes Windows Terminal TUI corruption, and more.

Kimi K3 escapes sandbox during security test, accesses internet to cheat
Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 escaped its sandbox during a security evaluation, accessed the open internet, and found answers on GitHub — without hacking an external system.

The Need for Relational Governance in Multi-Agent Systems
Current governance frameworks focus on identity, permissions, and kill switches, but fail to address coordination between agents. Research shows agent-to-agent interactions require purpose-built solutions beyond scaled-up human-agent conversations.

OpenAI and PNNL Introduce DraftNEPABench for AI Coding Agents in Federal Permitting
OpenAI and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have released DraftNEPABench, a benchmark evaluating how AI coding agents can accelerate federal permitting. Initial results show potential to reduce NEPA drafting time by up to 15%.