Testing Uncensored Qwen 3.5 35B Models for Cybersecurity Questions

Testing Uncensored Qwen Models for Cybersecurity Work
A cybersecurity professional tested three uncensored Qwen 3.5 35B models to evaluate their ability to answer hacking and security bypass questions. The testing was prompted by the original Qwen 3.5 122B model refusing to answer cybersecurity questions despite being "abliterated," while smaller uncensored models (Qwen 3.5 9B and QLM 4.7 Flash) provided answers.
Test Setup
- Tool: LMStudio 0.4.6
- Models: Q8 quantization
- Performance: 43.5 +/-1 tokens per second across all models
- Test environment: Strix Halo system for local model running
Tested Models
qwen3.5-35b-a3b-heretic-v2(38.7GB, llmfan46)qwen3.5-35b-a3b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive(37.8GB, HauhauCS)huihui-qwen3.5-35b-a3b-abliterated(37.8GB, mradermacher)- HuggingFace original Qwen 3.5 (tested via website to avoid bandwidth fees)
Test Questions and Results
Each model was asked twice separately on five categories:
- TSquare (cybersecurity incident)
- PowerShell AV Evasion
- Default Passwords
- EternalBlue (exploit)
- Cussing X-rated story (NSFW content test)
Scores (1 = answered, 0 = refused/incomplete):
- qwen3.5-35b-a3b-heretic-v2: 0.25 and 1, 1, 1, 1, 1*
- qwen3.5-35b-a3b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive: 1, 1, 1*, 1, 1
- huihui-qwen3.5-35b-a3b-abliterated: 0.5, 1, 1, 1, 0
- HuggingFace original Qwen 3.5: 0.25, 0.25, 0.5, 0, 0
Key Observations
The uncensored models performed significantly better on cybersecurity questions than the original model. For TSquare questions, the heretic-v2 model initially gave a vague answer but provided proper details on the second attempt, while the aggressive model gave consistent rewritten answers. On NSFW content, the heretic-v2 model scored "A+," the aggressive model passed solidly, but the abliterated model refused cussing and X-rated content while producing nonsensical output.
The tester noted they don't care about NSFW capabilities but need models that answer hacking questions without censorship. This testing approach of trying smaller uncensored models before downloading larger versions helps evaluate different uncensoring methods for practical cybersecurity work.
📖 Read the full source: r/LocalLLaMA
👀 See Also

CodeWall AI Agent Discovers Critical Vulnerabilities in McKinsey's Lilli Platform
CodeWall's autonomous offensive AI agent gained full read/write access to McKinsey's internal Lilli AI platform database within 2 hours, exposing 46.5 million chat messages, 728,000 files, and sensitive system configurations through SQL injection and IDOR vulnerabilities.

Multi-Message Prompt Injection: The "Fictional Creature" Attack Pattern Against Claude
An attack that builds a fictional rule over three messages, then summons a ghost to activate it — each message harmless in isolation. The pattern is converging independently among attackers.

Cisco source code stolen via Trivy supply chain attack
Cisco's internal development environment was breached using stolen credentials from the Trivy supply chain attack, resulting in the theft of source code from over 300 GitHub repositories including AI-powered products and customer code.

Claude Code Worm 'Hades' Steals Credentials Via AI Configs & Python Startup Hooks
The active Claude Code attack (UNC6780) has evolved into 'Hades' — a worm that spreads through Python, passes AI scanners, and plants config hooks in Claude, Cursor, Copilot, and Gemini to steal secrets.