Wikipedia's AI Policy: LLMs Banned for Article Creation, Exceptions for Copyediting and Translation

Wikipedia's AI information page codifies community consensus on AI use. The core rule is straightforward: LLMs are prohibited for generating or rewriting article content. Two exceptions exist: basic copyediting and LLM-assisted translation (per WP:LLMT), which requires the editor to be fluent in both source and target languages and to manually review every output before publishing.
Key Policies and Their Shortcuts
- G15 (
WP:G15): Speedy deletion for pages “that could only plausibly have been generated by large language models without reasonable human review.” - WP:AIIMAGES: Bans images wholly generated by AI, with specific rules for biographies of living persons (
WP:AIIMGBLP). - MOS:AIUPSCALE: Prohibits AI upscaling software on images.
- WP:RSML: AI-generated content cannot be cited as reliable sources. LLMs are listed as perennial sources.
- WP:AITALK: Talk page comments obviously written by an LLM may be struck or collapsed.
- WP:NICETRY: Unblock requests that appear AI-written are likely summarily rejected.
Practical Implications
If you're building AI agents that interact with Wikipedia, this means:
- Do not submit LLM-generated articles without thorough human rewriting — they risk immediate deletion under G15.
- Translation tools (like those using LLMs) are allowed only if the editor fully controls both languages and reviews each sentence.
- AI-assisted image generation is off-limits for Wikipedia articles.
The policy page also notes that works created solely by machines are not copyrightable (as of 2025), which is a relevant legal consideration for Wikimedia Commons uploads.
Discussion Timeline
The page tracks the evolution of these rules: initial discussions began in December 2022 in response to ChatGPT, with a disclosure suggestion in March 2023. The policies have been updated through March 2026.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Simple Self-Distillation Method Improves LLM Code Generation
Researchers show that fine-tuning LLMs on their own sampled outputs (simple self-distillation) improves code generation performance, boosting Qwen3-30B-Instruct from 42.4% to 55.3% pass@1 on LiveCodeBench v6.

World's First GitHub Exclusive for AI Agents Launched: Limited Beta for 100 Users
An innovative GitHub exclusive for AI coding agents has been developed, with a limited beta of 100 users. Dive into how this tool is set to revolutionize AI collaboration.

What's missing in the 'agentic' story: a well-defined user agent role
Mark Nottingham argues that current AI agents lack a clear user agent role, creating a trust gap between what users expect and what agents actually do.

Investigation: Claude Code Agents Surfacing Unverified MEMORY.md Content Due to Compaction Changes
A user reports that Claude Code agents are surfacing content from MEMORY.md without re-verifying mid-task, linked to compaction changes in versions 2.1.139 and 2.1.141. Two compounding factors: aggressive preservation of 'user instructions' and a bug in autocompact thresholds.