Claude Code developer acknowledges adaptive thinking flaw, provides workaround

Boris Charny, the creator of Claude Code at Anthropic, publicly engaged with developers on Hacker News about performance issues reported since February. Initially attributing problems to user settings, he shifted his position after examining bug transcripts.
Initial position: Settings issue
Charny's first explanation pointed to two intentional changes: hiding the thinking process (a UI change) and lowering the default effort level. The implicit message was that performance hadn't degraded - users were just experiencing the new, lower-cost default. He suggested changing settings back to /effort high for previous performance levels.
Shift to acknowledgment
When confronted with evidence from users already using the highest effort settings and still experiencing problems, Charny analyzed bug reports and moved from general settings explanations to specific technical diagnosis.
Final position: Specific flaw identified
Charny explicitly validated users' experiences, conceding that the "adaptive thinking" feature is "under-allocating reasoning." He confirmed this wasn't related to effort defaults, as telemetry showed affected sessions were sending effort=high on every request.
His final message stated: "The data points at adaptive thinking under-allocating reasoning on certain turns — the specific turns where it fabricated (stripe API version, git SHA suffix, apt package list) had zero reasoning emitted, while the turns with deep reasoning were correct."
Workaround and investigation
Charny provided an interim workaround: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADAPTIVE_THINKING=1 forces a fixed reasoning budget instead of letting the model decide per-turn. He noted the model team is investigating the issue.
The discussion demonstrates direct engagement between Anthropic technical staff and external developers, with transparency about technical issues affecting Claude Code's performance.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

Anthropic Uses Google Forms for Claude Feedback
Anthropic, the company behind Claude, uses a Google Form from 2008 to collect design feedback instead of building a custom tool—highlighting a pragmatic build vs. buy philosophy.

Cambridge researchers develop hafnium oxide memristor for low-energy AI chips
Researchers at the University of Cambridge have created a hafnium oxide-based memristor that switches currents a million times lower than conventional oxide devices, potentially reducing AI hardware energy use by up to 70%.

Opus 4.6 excels at research, Gemini 3.1 Pro has better judgment in forecasting benchmark
A benchmark of 1,417 binary forecasting questions separates research and judgment performance: Claude Opus 4.6 leads in agentic research, Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on fixed-evidence calibration. GPT-5.4 and Grok 4.20 show little change between conditions.

GitHub Copilot Removes Opus Models from Pro Plan, Pauses New Signups
GitHub is removing Opus models from the Copilot Pro plan and pausing new signups for Pro, Pro+, and Student plans. Opus 4.7 remains available on Pro+, while Pro+ plans now offer more than 5X the usage limits of Pro.