Don’t Use AI to Write Things You Present as Your Own Work

James Bach, a veteran testing expert, published a strong opinion on his blog Satisfice: never use AI to write anything that you present as your own work. He argues that even saying “AI helped me” immediately undermines your credibility, because everyone knows AI does far more than just “help.”
The Core Argument
Bach’s policy is absolute: “I never let AI draft anything for me that has my name on it. Not one sentence. Nothing. Ever.” He compares using AI for writing to “hooking a motor to a stationary bike and calling that exercise” or “taking a helicopter to the top of Everest and saying that I summited.”
Trust and Reputation
Bach warns that once you admit to using AI, readers can’t know how much work you did. He says: “All I have is your word for it that you did any work at all.” This forces a “big fat asterisk next to anything you do.” He adds, “Only someone who uses AI to help their writing would say ‘I use AI to help my writing.’ And anyone who uses AI to help their writing may use it to do all of their writing. It’s such a steep and slippery slope to full laziness.”
Personal Anecdote
Bach describes a past ghostwriting experience where he wrote an article for someone else, choosing what to include and exclude. The article was published under the other person’s name, but it was substantially Bach’s work. He regrets it because it helped “burnish the professional image of a man who didn’t earn it.” He contrasts this with a deep collaborative chapter co-written with Jeff Nadelman, where both contributed substantially—Jeff through many hours of Zoom calls and personal stories. Bach says: “If AI deeply collaborates with you to write something, why am I saying you shouldn’t say you used AI? Because all I have is your word for it that you did any work at all.”
The Slippery Slope
Bach believes the line between “help” and “doing all the work” is too blurry. He advises: “Don’t tell me that AI helped you write, and don’t tell me that you did all the work when you only did some of it. Therefore, don’t use AI to write things for you that you present as your own work. If you DO, I will treat all your work as if it is slop or spam. And not just me, the entire community of serious professionals will discount ‘your’ work.”
Takeaway for Developers Using AI Coding Agents
While the article focuses on writing, the principle applies to code as well. If you use an AI to generate substantial portions of code or documentation that you claim as your own, you risk the same trust erosion. Be transparent about your tools and always review and refine the output. But Bach’s core advice is clear: don’t outsource creative or intellectual work and then take full credit.
📖 Read the full source: HN LLM Tools
👀 See Also

Instead of Banning AI, a Professor Drafted a Classroom Contract with Students
A science professor created a classroom contract with students to define acceptable AI use, rather than banning it outright. The contract covers transparency, attribution, and accountability.
AMD Threadripper Halo Station: 96-Core AI Workstation with MI350P
At IFA 2026, AMD announced the Threadripper Halo Station, a workstation packing a 96-core Threadripper Pro 9995WX and dual liquid-cooled MI350P accelerators, designed to run trillion-parameter models.

Coinbase x402 vs Google A2A: Two Opposite Payment Orderings for Agent-to-Agent Payments
Building agent-to-agent payments reveals a fundamental split: Coinbase's x402 middleware settles after work (verify→run→settle), while Google's A2A extension settles before (verify→settle→run) for slow agentic calls.

SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT: Open Source Native Multimodal Model with NEO-Unify Architecture
SenseNova released SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT, a native multimodal model that eliminates both visual encoder and VAE, using NEO-Unify architecture for unified understanding, reasoning, and generation. It excels at text-to-infographics, image editing, and interleaved text-image generation.